From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24964 invoked by alias); 14 Feb 2003 15:24:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 24957 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2003 15:24:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (172.16.49.200) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 14 Feb 2003 15:24:36 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h1EFOaf05076 for ; Fri, 14 Feb 2003 10:24:36 -0500 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h1EFOZa16450; Fri, 14 Feb 2003 10:24:35 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (vpnuser1.stuttgart.redhat.com [172.16.4.1]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h1EFOX922101; Fri, 14 Feb 2003 10:24:33 -0500 Received: (from kev@localhost) by localhost.localdomain (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h1EFOQ610735; Fri, 14 Feb 2003 08:24:26 -0700 Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 15:24:00 -0000 From: Kevin Buettner Message-Id: <1030214152426.ZM10734@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: Daniel Jacobowitz "Re: frame_register_unwind(): "frame != NULL" assertion failure" (Feb 14, 10:14am) References: <1030213212349.ZM2427@localhost.localdomain> <20030213212904.GA14115@nevyn.them.org> <1030213213526.ZM2489@localhost.localdomain> <1030213214819.ZM2541@localhost.localdomain> <1030213232706.ZM8198@localhost.localdomain> <3E4D042F.3060102@redhat.com> <20030214151451.GC30416@nevyn.them.org> To: Daniel Jacobowitz , Andrew Cagney Subject: Re: frame_register_unwind(): "frame != NULL" assertion failure Cc: Kevin Buettner , gdb@sources.redhat.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00237.txt.bz2 On Feb 14, 10:14am, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > However, can you please first investigate modifying the start of > > mips_init_extra_frame_info() where it does: > > > > proc_desc = get_next_frame (fci) ? ..... > > > > to, when get_next_frame(fci) is null, call: > > > > find_proc_desc (get_frame_pc (fci), fci, 1); > > > > that is the current, and not prev frame. > > I'm pretty sure that won't work - we're initializing the saved regs for > fci right now, and find_proc_desc wants a frame to read registers out > of. Yes, I agree.