From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-9523-listarch-gdb=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 30491 invoked by alias); 9 Jul 2002 23:13:56 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 30483 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2002 23:13:54 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO gaea.projecticarus.com) (195.10.228.71)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 Jul 2002 23:13:54 -0000
Received: from [192.168.128.2] (host213-122-156-7.in-addr.btopenworld.com [213.122.156.7])
	by gaea.projecticarus.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g69NDKV09767;
	Wed, 10 Jul 2002 00:13:21 +0100
Subject: Re: Is Single step into C++ virtual thunk still broken?
From: Daedalus <daedalus@projecticarus.com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
In-Reply-To: <20020709202005.GA23405@nevyn.them.org>
References: <1026229835.2426.30.camel@pan>
	<20020709162742.GA5100@nevyn.them.org> <1026240215.1532.14.camel@mojo>
	<20020709185135.GA22053@nevyn.them.org> <1026245359.1532.22.camel@mojo> 
	<20020709202005.GA23405@nevyn.them.org>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2002 16:13:00 -0000
Message-Id: <1026256318.10599.2.camel@mojo>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2002-07/txt/msg00100.txt.bz2

On Tue, 2002-07-09 at 21:20, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> 
> Does this persist if you use -static?  If so, please give me:
>   thunk.o (compile using g++ -g3 -c thunk.cpp)
>   thunk (compile using g++ -g3 -o thunk thunk.o -static)
> 
> and I'll see if I can figure out what's going wrong.  I doubt I can run
> RH7.3 dynamically linked libraries.
> 

FYI, I tried the latest cvs version of gcc 3.2, and got the same
results.

Andrew Walrond