From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8798 invoked by alias); 27 Sep 2002 18:59:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 8654 invoked from network); 27 Sep 2002 18:59:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 27 Sep 2002 18:59:13 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8RIewi00839 for ; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 14:40:58 -0400 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8RIxAf28994; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 14:59:10 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (vpn50-37.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.37]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8RIx9J04768; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 14:59:09 -0400 Received: (from kev@localhost) by localhost.localdomain (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g8RIx3r24288; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 11:59:03 -0700 Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 11:59:00 -0000 From: Kevin Buettner Message-Id: <1020927185903.ZM24287@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: Elena Zannoni "Re: RFC: dummy.[hc] and ``struct dummy''" (Sep 27, 2:35pm) References: <3D938E6F.6090809@redhat.com> <2427-Fri27Sep2002201112+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> <3D94A16E.6010409@redhat.com> <20020927182200.GA16046@nevyn.them.org> <15764.42249.38594.693286@localhost.redhat.com> To: Elena Zannoni , Daniel Jacobowitz Subject: Re: RFC: dummy.[hc] and ``struct dummy'' Cc: Andrew Cagney , Eli Zaretskii , gdb@sources.redhat.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00486.txt.bz2 On Sep 27, 2:35pm, Elena Zannoni wrote: > > I think dummy-frame works well. > > infcall.[ch] ? (which goes with infcmd.c) I like this one. I don't mind dummy-frame.[hc] either, but it's not 8.3 compliant. Kevin