From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-10442-listarch-gdb=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 28521 invoked by alias); 19 Sep 2002 20:11:50 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 28511 invoked from network); 19 Sep 2002 20:11:49 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 Sep 2002 20:11:49 -0000
Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (nat-pool-rdu-dmz.redhat.com [172.16.52.200])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8JJsUi00979
	for <gdb@sources.redhat.com>; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 15:54:30 -0400
Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15])
	by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8JKBjx22399;
	Thu, 19 Sep 2002 16:11:45 -0400
Received: from romulus.sfbay.redhat.com (remus.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.252])
	by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8JKBhC22606;
	Thu, 19 Sep 2002 13:11:43 -0700
Received: (from kev@localhost)
	by romulus.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g8JKBf622343;
	Thu, 19 Sep 2002 13:11:41 -0700
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 13:11:00 -0000
From: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <1020919201141.ZM22342@localhost.localdomain>
In-Reply-To: Keith Seitz <keiths@redhat.com>
        "Re: branching" (Sep 19,  1:09pm)
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0209191247430.1407-100000@valrhona.uglyboxes.com>
To: Keith Seitz <keiths@redhat.com>, Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: branching
Cc: David Carlton <carlton@math.stanford.edu>, <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00285.txt.bz2

On Sep 19,  1:09pm, Keith Seitz wrote:

> FWIW, David, your procedure is exactly the procedure that I've been using 
> in my interpreter branch.

Do you create a new tag for each merge?

Do you remove old tags that are no longer useful?

(Tags are cheap, but if there are enough of them, there is a definite
cost.)

Kevin