From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 420 invoked by alias); 19 Aug 2002 18:35:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 412 invoked from network); 19 Aug 2002 18:35:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 Aug 2002 18:35:22 -0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (nat-pool-rdu.redhat.com [172.16.52.200] (may be forged)) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7JILBl09235 for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2002 14:21:11 -0400 Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7JIZJu23356; Mon, 19 Aug 2002 14:35:19 -0400 Received: from romulus.sfbay.redhat.com (remus.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.252]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7JIZIe07835; Mon, 19 Aug 2002 11:35:18 -0700 Received: (from kev@localhost) by romulus.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g7JIZGU21165; Mon, 19 Aug 2002 11:35:16 -0700 Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2002 11:35:00 -0000 From: Kevin Buettner Message-Id: <1020819183516.ZM21164@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: Andrew Cagney "Register Groups (again)" (Aug 17, 7:48pm) References: <3D5EE0C6.7080902@ges.redhat.com> To: Andrew Cagney , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Register Groups (again) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2002-08/txt/msg00213.txt.bz2 On Aug 17, 7:48pm, Andrew Cagney wrote: > - how it relates to frames > > It currently assumes that the register groups are identical between > frames :-/ So long as we have a way to distinguish architectures between frames, we should have a way to identify different register groups (between frames), right? > comments, thoughts? Aside from not understanding the frame comment, it looks okay to me. Kevin