From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19908 invoked by alias); 8 Aug 2002 18:37:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 19899 invoked from network); 8 Aug 2002 18:37:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 8 Aug 2002 18:37:09 -0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (nat-pool-rdu.redhat.com [172.16.52.200] (may be forged)) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g78INwl17637 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 14:23:58 -0400 Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g78Ib6u30378; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 14:37:06 -0400 Received: from romulus.sfbay.redhat.com (remus.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.252]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g78Ib5e04587; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 11:37:05 -0700 Received: (from kev@localhost) by romulus.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g78Iaxc23949; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 11:36:59 -0700 Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2002 11:37:00 -0000 From: Kevin Buettner Message-Id: <1020808183658.ZM23948@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: Andrew Cagney "Re: GDB threading/FP bug" (Aug 8, 1:34pm) References: <14c93f3a.0208071239.2143c199@posting.google.com> <14c93f3a.0208080853.413a3b88@posting.google.com> <3D52AB90.4050203@ges.redhat.com> To: Andrew Cagney , bennet Subject: Re: GDB threading/FP bug Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2002-08/txt/msg00074.txt.bz2 On Aug 8, 1:34pm, Andrew Cagney wrote: > > Some better searching revealed this is a very old bug. From last > > year: > > > > http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&th=adfbc404c374e980&seekm=OF36816CDD.AE7D54AF-ONC1256B1F.005622DC%40icos.be&frame=off > > > > I tried running GDB in GDB and I was able to get as far as seeing that > > the floats seemed to be pushed onto the stack correctly until the > > thread switch and all the ptrace stuff, but I wasn't totally sure if > > the bug I was seeing at that point was in the GDB'd GDB or was the > > same bug in the outter GDB. > > [Mailing list changed to something with less spam :-)] > > As you've discovered, there have been a number of very similar bugs that > all involving corrupted FP and threads. It was thought that fixes for > all such bugs were incorporated into both 5.2.* > (http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/download/) and the mainline > (http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/current/). > > Can you please check that your problem does occur in the latest > release/mainline, and if it does, create a bug report using > http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/bugs/. Yes, I thought this bug was fixed too. FWIW, I just did a build of gdb-5.2.1 on a Red Hat 7.3 machine (x86). I wasn't able to reproduce the bug using the test program provided by Bennet. (I've also tested the current development sources and, as expected, don't see the bug there either.) Kevin