From: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
To: Piet/Pete Delaney <piet@sgi.com>, Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: ia64-stub.c
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 13:57:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1020122215702.ZM6622@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Piet/Pete Delaney <piet@sgi.com> "Re: ia64-stub.c" (Jan 22, 12:51pm)
On Jan 22, 12:51pm, Piet/Pete Delaney wrote:
> I expected them to be offsets into the registers stored in memory in the
> order specified by the ia64_register_names[] array in gdb/ia64-tdep.c.
See u_offsets[] in gdbserver/low-linux.c. These are the offsets
needed by the ptrace() operations PTRACE_PEEKUSER / PTRACE_POKEUSER.
I haven't tried it in a while, so these offsets may need some
updating. (They ought to match the offsets found in ia64-linux-nat.c.)
> I was also wondering if the macro REGISTER_RAW_SIZE in gdb/config/ia64/tm-ia64.h
> is correct. It's saying that all registers other that the floating point are 8 bytes
> long.
The macro in question is defined that way for gdbserver. Note that the
IA-64 target is multiarched and that the only definition that GDB uses
from config/ia64/tm-ia64.h is:
#define GDB_MULTI_ARCH 1
Anyway, REGISTER_RAW_SIZE is about a correct as it can be for gdbserver.
> I thought I read that the predict registers p0..p63 are 1 bit and packed into
> a single 64 bit chunk of memory.
They're packed into the pr register. ia64-tdep.c knows how to unpack
this register to give you discreet p0..p63 registers. (Note that from
GDB's standpoint these registers are read-only. A bit of work still
needs to be done to make them writable too.)
> I was wondering if by passing all of the registers in
> the ia64_register_names I was passing to much and clobbering some data structures.
It's possible. I seem to remember fixing something like this when I was
using it. It could be that it's broken again.
> When
> I use the gdb info registers cmd it seems to know the values in first 31 registers from
> my response to the 'g' cmd but then tries to access memory for the rest.
This is correct.
> The memory location
> it's trys to access is an offset from the values it receives for the first 31 registers.
That's not right. It should be an offset from bsp.
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-01-22 21:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-01-21 1:00 ia64-stub.c Piet/Pete Delaney
2002-01-21 13:45 ` ia64-stub.c Kevin Buettner
[not found] ` <20020122105652.A57552@sgi.com>
[not found] ` <1020122190037.ZM5902@localhost.localdomain>
[not found] ` <20020122121956.B57552@sgi.com>
2002-01-22 12:51 ` ia64-stub.c Piet/Pete Delaney
2002-01-22 13:57 ` Kevin Buettner [this message]
2002-01-22 15:35 ` ia64-stub.c Piet/Pete Delaney
2002-01-22 18:27 ` ia64-stub.c Kevin Buettner
2002-01-22 23:47 ` ia64-stub.c Piet/Pete Delaney
2002-01-23 3:16 ` ia64-stub.c Kevin Buettner
2002-01-23 4:44 ` ia64-stub.c Piet/Pete Delaney
2002-01-23 7:29 ` ia64-stub.c Andrew Cagney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1020122215702.ZM6622@localhost.localdomain \
--to=kevinb@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=piet@sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox