From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22927 invoked by alias); 6 Dec 2001 01:26:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 22743 invoked from network); 6 Dec 2001 01:24:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cygnus.com) (205.180.230.5) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 6 Dec 2001 01:24:55 -0000 Received: from cse.cygnus.com (cse.cygnus.com [205.180.230.236]) by runyon.cygnus.com (8.8.7-cygnus/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA11914 for ; Wed, 5 Dec 2001 17:24:52 -0800 (PST) Received: (from kev@localhost) by cse.cygnus.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id SAA06342 for gdb@sources.redhat.com; Wed, 5 Dec 2001 18:24:08 -0700 Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2001 17:26:00 -0000 From: Kevin Buettner Message-Id: <1011206012408.ZM6341@ocotillo.lan> X-Mailer: Z-Mail (4.0.1 13Jan97 Caldera) To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Is somsolib.c still in use? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2001-12/txt/msg00045.txt.bz2 The subject line says it all; does anyone know if somsolib.c is still used by any port? I've done my own checking and expected somsolib.o to show up on a NATDEPFILES line in a *.mh file, but couldn't find one. If it's not in use, we ought to mark this file obsolete ASAP. That'll mean one less solib file to convert... Kevin