From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21656 invoked by alias); 29 Nov 2001 21:11:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 20507 invoked from network); 29 Nov 2001 21:10:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cygnus.com) (205.180.230.5) by hostedprojects.ges.redhat.com with SMTP; 29 Nov 2001 21:10:10 -0000 Received: from cse.cygnus.com (cse.cygnus.com [205.180.230.236]) by runyon.cygnus.com (8.8.7-cygnus/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA03953; Thu, 29 Nov 2001 13:10:08 -0800 (PST) Received: (from kev@localhost) by cse.cygnus.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id OAA19301; Thu, 29 Nov 2001 14:09:58 -0700 Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2001 09:01:00 -0000 From: Kevin Buettner Message-Id: <1011129210958.ZM19300@ocotillo.lan> In-Reply-To: Daniel Jacobowitz "Re: C++ debugging progress" (Nov 29, 3:27pm) References: <20011128020256.A9688@nevyn.them.org> <20011128124118.A23447@nevyn.them.org> <20011128163159.A3256@nevyn.them.org> <20011129152709.A9719@nevyn.them.org> X-Mailer: Z-Mail (4.0.1 13Jan97 Caldera) To: Daniel Jacobowitz , Jason Merrill Subject: Re: C++ debugging progress Cc: libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2001-11/txt/msg00237.txt.bz2 On Nov 29, 3:27pm, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 05:42:06PM +0000, Jason Merrill wrote: > > >>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Jacobowitz writes: > > > > > Any chance of getting this into 3.0.3 also > > > > The change seems to make things worse with gdb 5.1, so I'm not sure that > > would be a good idea. > > To be honest, I'd rather the patch go in anyway. C++ debugging for v3 > is so broken in gdb 5.1 that it does not make a lot of sense to cater > to it. FWIW, I agree with Daniel. There's been talk of a possible gdb 5.1.1. I'd be all in favor of Daniel's C++ fixes going into 5.1.1 if Jason's fixes go into a mainline gcc version. Kevin From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kevin Buettner To: Daniel Jacobowitz , Jason Merrill Cc: libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: C++ debugging progress Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 13:11:00 -0000 Message-ID: <1011129210958.ZM19300@ocotillo.lan> References: <20011128020256.A9688@nevyn.them.org> <20011128124118.A23447@nevyn.them.org> <20011128163159.A3256@nevyn.them.org> <20011129152709.A9719@nevyn.them.org> X-SW-Source: 2001-11/msg00344.html Message-ID: <20011129131100.YC2PxmPgYk3gGnoJzz66SO3BFdwPwj7hIo5qvWbrz3k@z> On Nov 29, 3:27pm, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 05:42:06PM +0000, Jason Merrill wrote: > > >>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Jacobowitz writes: > > > > > Any chance of getting this into 3.0.3 also > > > > The change seems to make things worse with gdb 5.1, so I'm not sure that > > would be a good idea. > > To be honest, I'd rather the patch go in anyway. C++ debugging for v3 > is so broken in gdb 5.1 that it does not make a lot of sense to cater > to it. FWIW, I agree with Daniel. There's been talk of a possible gdb 5.1.1. I'd be all in favor of Daniel's C++ fixes going into 5.1.1 if Jason's fixes go into a mainline gcc version. Kevin