From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@cygnus.com>
To: "H . J . Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>, Kevin Buettner <kevinb@cygnus.com>
Cc: Mike Krogh <krogh@ceintl.com>, gdb@sourceware.cygnus.com
Subject: Re: debugging a dynamically loaded library
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2001 23:05:00 -0000
Message-id: <1010906060403.ZM6589@ocotillo.lan>
References: <15245.21579.555348.285018@gomer.ceintl.com> <krogh@ceintl.com> <1010829224126.ZM19874@ocotillo.lan> <20010829160725.A25904@lucon.org> <hjl@lucon.org> <1010903225850.ZM1797@ocotillo.lan> <20010905222950.A21097@lucon.org>
X-SW-Source: 2001-09/msg00039.html

On Sep 5, 10:29pm, H . J . Lu wrote:

> I am wondering if
> 
> 1327   FUN    0      36     00000000 31372  __strtol_internal:F(0,3)
> 
> is a valid stab entry. It it is valid, why does it trigger the
> SOFUN_ADDRESS_MAYBE_MISSING code in gdb. Is that possible a linker
> or assembler bug?

It's always possible that there's a bug elsewhere, but my guess is
that __strtol_internal() is merely the first function in the section
in which case the above entry makes sense to me.

Kevin