From: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@cygnus.com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <dmj+@andrew.cmu.edu>, gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] Changes to *_*regset functions
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 12:21:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1010713192049.ZM20362@ocotillo.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010713102605.A32410@nevyn.them.org>
On Jul 13, 10:26am, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> Given that almost every call to or definition of these functions starts by
> casting its arguments anyway, I'd like to change the prototypes to the
> somewhat vaguer:
>
> extern void supply_gregset (char *gregs);
> extern void supply_fpregset (char *fpregs);
> extern void fill_gregset (char *gregs, int regno);
> extern void fill_fpregset (char *fpregs, int regno);
>
> It'll add a couple of casts, and remove a couple, and end up with functions
> that can be safely defined in a cross debugger.
>
> Any objection to this?
For this type of thing, I'd prefer to see void * rather than char *.
Of course, the problem with using void * is that we can now pass any
pointer type at all and the compiler won't bat an eye. One of the
things that I learned while doing the ptid_t conversions was that
passing structs (and not pointers to structs) was incredibly useful
for catching type errors. (Pointers to structs work okay too if your
code compiles cleanly with -Werror.) Of course, your struct could be
defined something like this:
struct gdb_gregset
{
void *gregset_ptr; /* pointer to a chunk of memory with the
registers. */
};
Then one of your prototypes could be:
extern void supply_gregset (struct gdb_gregset gregs);
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-07-13 12:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-07-13 10:26 Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-07-13 11:47 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-07-13 12:35 ` Kevin Buettner
2001-07-13 12:43 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-07-13 12:55 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-07-13 12:21 ` Kevin Buettner [this message]
[not found] ` <3B4F4CC1.1A9076AB@home.com>
[not found] ` <1010713195425.ZM20451@ocotillo.lan>
2001-07-13 13:07 ` Can you point me in the right direction Stephen Smith
2001-07-13 13:29 ` Kevin Buettner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1010713192049.ZM20362@ocotillo.lan \
--to=kevinb@cygnus.com \
--cc=dmj+@andrew.cmu.edu \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox