From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@cygnus.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>, gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: DOS/Windows-specific code: values.c
Date: Tue, 08 May 2001 23:58:00 -0000
Message-id: <1010509065838.ZM22280@ocotillo.lan>
References: <20010503211502.21716.qmail@web6401.mail.yahoo.com> <3AF1DAA0.3060702@cygnus.com> <200105071609.TAA24129@is.elta.co.il> <200105081155.OAA06330@is.elta.co.il> <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-SW-Source: 2001-05/msg00170.html

On May 8,  2:55pm, Eli Zaretskii wrote:

>     * values.c:unpack_double()
> 
> 	  /* Unsigned -- be sure we compensate for signed LONGEST.  */
>     #if !defined (_MSC_VER) || (_MSC_VER > 900)
> 	  return (ULONGEST) unpack_long (type, valaddr);
>     #else
> 	  /* FIXME!!! msvc22 doesn't support unsigned __int64 -> double */
> 	  return (LONGEST) unpack_long (type, valaddr);
>     #endif /* _MSC_VER */
> 
> There's _got_ to be a better way to do this!

Is this even an issue any longer?  I.e, is the version of MSC being
catered to by the above ifdefs still in widespread use?

Kevin