Re: compile problem

[Frans J King <frans.king@lin-x-pert.com>]

Thanks for your help. I've had success with ./configure
--target=arm-sim-elf --prefix=/usr/local -v

No problems with the build and the simulator seems to work fine.

(Running under RedHat 7.1 on an AMD Duron)

Frans

On Thu, 2001-10-25 at 18:54, Keith Seitz wrote:
> On 25 Oct 2001, Frans J King wrote:
> 
> > I'm not sure if this is the right place to be posting this byt here
> > goes.
> 
> This is the right place AFAICT.
> 
> > I can't compile gdb version 5.0 upwards for arm-elf. The command to
> > configure I use is ./configure --host=i686-pc-gnu --target=arm-elf
> > --prefix=/usr/local
> 
> Three things followed by a lot of conjecture...
> 
> 1) Don't use 5.0 for arm. It's really broken. Get something newer.
> 2) If you're configuring for building on the same machine you're running
>    on, don't specify "--host", it's not needed. I have had strange
>    experiences with configure when I specified "--host and --target" but
>    not "--build". So specify ALL three or just "--target" to be safe.
>    I'm not saying this is the cause of your problem, or that this is
>    necesssarily a problem. It is just my experience. YMMV.
> 3) On what host system are you trying to build (os, vendor)?
> 
> > Once I begin the make, it fails at pty_termios.c in the expect
> > directory.
> >
> > pty_termios.c:174 conflicting types for 'slave_name'
> > pty_termios.c:135 previous declaration of 'slave_name'
> > pty_termios.c: In function 'exp_getptymaster':
> > pty_termios.c:377: incompatible types in assignment
> 
> This is in expect, of all places. Your conflict is happening because both
> HAVE_OPENPTY and one (or more) of HAVE__GETPTY, HAVE_PTC_PTS, or HAVE_PTMX
> is defined by configure. Sounds like configure is messed up about
> something.
> 
> HAVE_OPENPTY will get defined when openpty () exists, but only for
> non-linux hosts. If you're using linux, then #2 above is a solution to
> your problem. You'll know you've got this in your build, too, because
> "ac_cv_func_openpty" will be set to "yes" in config.cache.
> 
> HAVE_PTC_PTS is defined when "AIX new-style pty allocation" exists, i.e.,
> /dev/ptc exists but /dev/pts does not. I doubt this is your problem.
> 
> HAVE_PTMX is defined when "SVR4 style pty allocation" exists, i.e.,
> /dev/ptmx exists, and sysVr4 ptys are determined to be broken. Unlikely to
> be your problem.
> 
> My guess: the openpty thing.
> 
> Keith
> 
>