From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19420 invoked by alias); 29 Aug 2016 10:48:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 19405 invoked by uid 89); 29 Aug 2016 10:48:55 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:916, mingw32, Avast, UD:avast.com X-HELO: mail-qt0-f178.google.com Received: from mail-qt0-f178.google.com (HELO mail-qt0-f178.google.com) (209.85.216.178) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 10:48:45 +0000 Received: by mail-qt0-f178.google.com with SMTP id 52so66037838qtq.3 for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 03:48:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:references:to:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=t7yZ22o0ZlqVe7Lol4WKgLd+x0b5g22rDLZiJvv4G70=; b=HvkMtBb9ckpL4p2+R7U9T7XV1L0pHZ67JWatKM8jqOsvH6aZgI0PWYUnpSXX2EACJE IXh8OaNNjGrADHmUINn337FsUEbK9XrCcvGQ8gQDqcYi6tscfH4cdD5howG7Lokt/+hZ MpDsJhy37I69EjdBIc9ELnDZ6An2ArnPi+I0mCFUSJWH3ZIQ3iSWBqXh3yODkbugOAlv kfRJq3FP08TZYCXvod6impQpOJ8PRb5KPsrd7nvk3TtAtW/VmICNrQN6/H3ckASMU3+9 r4vJRRfqD4XggNEb5rmWXWM8B+Vd1ZGaMZMygy1WxAfI8KK9fYzQ1d8/jboQ1SmYkHea uBaA== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwMS2JbP8pnCdrk0nirpVpHwoNZxD6RjE4yDF8LcmBClyCAcbiNN4aDO2expvGu4/Q== X-Received: by 10.237.53.125 with SMTP id b58mr16923047qte.104.1472467723263; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 03:48:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (96-32-45-191.dhcp.nwtn.ct.charter.com. [96.32.45.191]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id 21sm15000110qkg.43.2016.08.29.03.48.42 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 29 Aug 2016 03:48:42 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: MinGW build target References: <5772c318-60ea-7728-5fd2-4706e38f46f8@gmail.com> <83vaykbvgv.fsf@gnu.org> <83twe4buvf.fsf@gnu.org> To: gdb@sourceware.org From: Glenn Burkhardt Message-ID: <0d2ab350-d00c-fc30-28ed-872f5f7ca223@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 10:48:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <83twe4buvf.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2016-08/txt/msg00056.txt.bz2 Thanks - that works better. I suppose that the '32' on 'mingw32' is an artifact that predates the MinGW-w64 fork of the MinGW code base. On 8/28/2016 2:39 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2016 21:26:56 +0300 >> From: Eli Zaretskii >> CC: gdb@sourceware.org >> >>> What's the correct build target for MinGW-w64? I tried using >>> >>> --build=x86_64-w64-mingw64 >>> >>> with gdb-7.11.1 and x86_64-6.1.0-release-posix-seh-rt_v5-rev0, and it's >>> trying to compile ser-unix.c. That doesn't seem right, and, of course, >>> MinGW doesn't include . >> Why do you need an explicit argument? Doesn't config.guess guess >> correctly? If not, maybe your uname needs and update/upgrade? > In any case, it sounds like x86_64-w64-mingw32 is what you want. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus