From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 121930 invoked by alias); 26 Oct 2016 14:50:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 121756 invoked by uid 89); 26 Oct 2016 14:50:31 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=our X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 14:50:30 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 376FF18E3C0; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 14:50:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u9QEoSBW018222; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 10:50:28 -0400 Subject: Re: False positive permanent breakpoints To: Ofir Cohen References: <651566f6-e57a-f816-8012-4080d7bc865c@redhat.com> Cc: "gdb@sourceware.org" From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: <0c2c2c0f-bb51-7124-8a6d-d3d633788471@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 14:50:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2016-10/txt/msg00050.txt.bz2 On 10/26/2016 03:42 PM, Ofir Cohen wrote: > Hi Pedro, > Thanks for the reply. > Let me provide some clarifications :-). > > 1) The product is part of the "Intel SDK for OpenCL" [1] for Windows and Linux. > You can see how it looks in [2]. Ah, OK. > > 2) iGPU - Yes, Integrated GPU > > 3) Upstream is in our plans and actually we are preparing a clean > series of patches on top of 7.12 (currently we are rebased on top > of 7.6, yeah I know...). Nice! (FAOD, for upstream you'll need to rebase on master.) > > 4) Software breakpoints are officially supported by the HW, but > haven't been tested and used yet, so we're OK with them being > "disabled" at the moment. > > The sources for gdb (as well as other components) are provided with > the installer script, > which can be downloaded _free of charge_ via [1] --> "Download" . > > Is that good enough for making an upstream change? > > I can try and prepare a small patch. I'd rather that upstreaming that bit was done when the rest of the port is submitted as well. Thanks, Pedro Alves