Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Smith via Gdb <gdb@sourceware.org>
To: gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: GDB 15/16 crashing in add_thread_silent()
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2025 15:42:39 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0acb00caa135109f9994faaf97753b0024af8072.camel@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6c6b248a1b5385f0fec590e475934d207d7ef71e.camel@gnu.org>

On Fri, 2025-11-14 at 15:29 -0500, Paul Smith via Gdb wrote:
> Anyway, Tom de Vries writes this in summary:
> 
> > I suppose this is fixable, but I'm not sure it's worth the effort
> > for
> > a core file that has such limited usability.
> 
> I don't know about his core, but my coredump definitely doesn't have
> limited usability, because when I use GDB 8.2 from Rocky Linux the
> core is fully usable in all respects: I can see all the threads and
> interact with them in all ways.

Following Tom's debugging steps (I really don't know much about what
sections should exist in a core file or what the format should be) I
see that there is a similar problem using objdump.

If I use the native objdump from Rocky Linux, version 2.30-125.el8_10,
I get these types of results for .reg2 (note, there are no .reg
sections in this core file):

  0 note0         00009bf4  0000000000000000  0000000000000000  00001bd0  2**0
                  CONTENTS, READONLY
  1 .auxv         00000150  0000000000000000  0000000000000000  00002074  2**3
                  CONTENTS
  2 .reg2/9168    00000210  0000000000000000  0000000000000000  00002374  2**2
                  CONTENTS
  3 .reg2         00000210  0000000000000000  0000000000000000  00002374  2**2
                  CONTENTS
  4 .reg2/9168    00000210  0000000000000000  0000000000000000  00002734  2**2
                  CONTENTS
  5 .reg2/9168    00000210  0000000000000000  0000000000000000  00002af4  2**2
                  CONTENTS
  6 .reg2/9168    00000210  0000000000000000  0000000000000000  00002eb4  2**2
                  CONTENTS
  7 .reg2/9168    00000210  0000000000000000  0000000000000000  00003274  2**2
                  CONTENTS
  ...
 40 .reg2/9168    00000210  0000000000000000  0000000000000000  0000ae34  2**2
                  CONTENTS
 41 .reg2/9168    00000210  0000000000000000  0000000000000000  0000b1f4  2**2
                  CONTENTS
 42 .reg2/9168    00000210  0000000000000000  0000000000000000  0000b5b4  2**2
                  CONTENTS
 43 load1         00000000  0000000000400000  0000000000000000  00010000  2**16
                  ALLOC, READONLY, CODE
  ...

But, if I use the latest objdump 2.43.1, I get very different results:

  0 note0         00009bf4  0000000000000000  0000000000000000  00001bd0  2**0
                  CONTENTS, READONLY
  1 .auxv         00000150  0000000000000000  0000000000000000  00002074  2**3
                  CONTENTS
  2 .reg2/0       00000210  0000000000000000  0000000000000000  00002374  2**2
                  CONTENTS
  3 .reg2         00000210  0000000000000000  0000000000000000  00002374  2**2
                  CONTENTS
  4 .reg2/0       00000210  0000000000000000  0000000000000000  00002734  2**2
                  CONTENTS
  5 .reg2/0       00000210  0000000000000000  0000000000000000  00002af4  2**2
                  CONTENTS
  6 .reg2/0       00000210  0000000000000000  0000000000000000  00002eb4  2**2
                  CONTENTS
  7 .reg2/0       00000210  0000000000000000  0000000000000000  00003274  2**2
                  CONTENTS
  ...
 40 .reg2/0       00000210  0000000000000000  0000000000000000  0000ae34  2**2
                  CONTENTS
 41 .reg2/0       00000210  0000000000000000  0000000000000000  0000b1f4  2**2
                  CONTENTS
 42 .reg2/0       00000210  0000000000000000  0000000000000000  0000b5b4  2**2
                  CONTENTS
 43 load1         01ae0000  0000000000400000  0000000000000000  00010000  2**16
                  ALLOC, READONLY, CODE
  ...

So, there appears to be some difference in binutils where it can't
parse this core file properly...?

  reply	other threads:[~2025-11-14 20:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-14 18:56 Paul Smith via Gdb
2025-11-14 19:12 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb
2025-11-14 19:20 ` Paul Smith via Gdb
2025-11-14 19:25   ` Simon Marchi via Gdb
2025-11-14 19:38     ` Paul Smith via Gdb
2025-11-14 20:03       ` Simon Marchi via Gdb
2025-11-14 20:13         ` Tom Tromey
2025-11-14 20:29           ` Paul Smith via Gdb
2025-11-14 20:42             ` Paul Smith via Gdb [this message]
2025-11-18 18:33               ` Tom Tromey
2025-11-18 19:30                 ` Paul Smith via Gdb
2025-11-18 20:24                   ` Simon Marchi via Gdb
2025-11-24 16:36                     ` Paul Smith via Gdb
2025-11-21 11:59       ` Tom de Vries via Gdb
2025-11-24 15:19         ` Paul Smith via Gdb

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0acb00caa135109f9994faaf97753b0024af8072.camel@gnu.org \
    --to=gdb@sourceware.org \
    --cc=psmith@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox