From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 80489 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2016 18:52:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 80480 invoked by uid 89); 24 Nov 2016 18:52:19 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=setjmp, Hx-languages-length:446 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Nov 2016 18:52:18 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED74FC05AA61; Thu, 24 Nov 2016 18:52:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn03.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.3]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id uAOIqFkZ004123; Thu, 24 Nov 2016 13:52:16 -0500 Subject: Re: gdb-7.12 powerpc-rtems4.12-gdb does not build on FreeBSD. To: John Baldwin References: <5834D6E0.9060601@rtems.org> <2179193.1CJTdt5csh@ralph.baldwin.cx> <3e3f8637-bd0c-4849-0430-1922a737f8f7@redhat.com> <7134105.CQ6yKBgfxn@ralph.baldwin.cx> Cc: Chris Johns , gdb@sourceware.org From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: <09762c4c-95b5-78c0-a51a-dd5d0956e981@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 18:52:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <7134105.CQ6yKBgfxn@ralph.baldwin.cx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2016-11/txt/msg00051.txt.bz2 On 11/24/2016 03:24 PM, John Baldwin wrote: > Do you think the sims will eventually want to use C++? That's up to Mike, I think. > If so, switching them to build as C++ seems like less work overall as it would solve this while being > a step towards that direction. If sims need to stay plain C, then I think I > prefer the setjmp/longjmp approach. Me too. Thanks, Pedro Alves