From: "Kris Warkentin" <kewarken@qnx.com>
To: "Daniel Jacobowitz" <drow@mvista.com>
Cc: <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: command api question
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2002 12:19:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <086c01c1da83$c63222f0$b6010c0a@catdog> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020402142522.A25748@nevyn.them.org>
Well, maybe if there were a generic method to get/set variables in the
command api. It's possible to do the following from the prompt:
(gdb) set solib-search-path /some/path
or
(gdb) show solib-search-path
so if there were an easy programmatic way of doing this, then we wouldn't
have to worry about compile time defines.
cheers,
Kris
----- Original Message -----
From: "Daniel Jacobowitz" <drow@mvista.com>
To: "Kris Warkentin" <kewarken@qnx.com>
Cc: <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 2:25 PM
Subject: Re: command api question
> On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 02:22:36PM -0500, Kris Warkentin wrote:
> > Is that an agreeable solution? Or would it be better to just provide
> > get/set functions? We're hoping to get our changes rolled into the gdb
head
> > branch someday and we want to keep things as clean as possible. (ie. as
few
> > changes as possible to common files, most stuff implemented in separate
qnx
> > files).
>
> Well, I also have a solib search path patch that I'd like to get rolled
> in. It's not in an appropriate form right now though. And I think
> there was a third in the list archives over a year ago, that met with
> some opposition.
>
> I'd really like to see the search path become (at least) compile-time
> default configurable...
>
> --
> Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University
> MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-04-02 20:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-04-02 10:50 Kris Warkentin
2002-04-02 10:55 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-04-02 11:22 ` Kris Warkentin
2002-04-02 11:25 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-04-02 12:19 ` Kris Warkentin [this message]
2002-04-02 12:24 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-04-03 8:54 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-04-03 9:06 ` Kris Warkentin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='086c01c1da83$c63222f0$b6010c0a@catdog' \
--to=kewarken@qnx.com \
--cc=drow@mvista.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox