From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15457 invoked by alias); 27 Jun 2003 17:49:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 15450 invoked from network); 27 Jun 2003 17:49:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hydra.ubicom.com) (4.20.168.98) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 27 Jun 2003 17:49:40 -0000 Received: FROM fenway.scenix.com BY hydra.ubicom.com ; Fri Jun 27 10:47:25 2003 -0700 Received: from nkelseyxp (NKELSEY-XP [192.168.1.187]) by fenway.scenix.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2656.59) id N1NFK65Z; Fri, 27 Jun 2003 10:47:19 -0700 Message-ID: <084301c33cd4$2de5e400$0a02a8c0@scenix.com> Reply-To: "Jafa" From: "Jafa" To: Subject: frame unwinding code Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 17:49:00 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-SW-Source: 2003-06/txt/msg00513.txt.bz2 Hi guys, I am bringing the ip2k port back up to speed with the top of the trunk... I am trying to figure out the frame unwinding code - so far I have looked and avr, mips, and arm but I am struggling to work out which port is a good reference for the new approach. Can you please point me in the right direction - I wrote and thus am familiar with the ip2k frame unwinding code, and would rather updated it completely to used the new scheme rather than hacking it using the deprecated functions. Thanks Nick Nick Kelsey Senior Software Engineer Ubicom www.ubicom.com