From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9885 invoked by alias); 16 Sep 2003 16:01:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 9865 invoked from network); 16 Sep 2003 16:01:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hub.ott.qnx.com) (209.226.137.76) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 Sep 2003 16:01:01 -0000 Received: from smtp.ott.qnx.com (smtp.ott.qnx.com [10.0.2.158]) by hub.ott.qnx.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA23504 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2003 11:59:54 -0400 Received: from catdog ([10.4.2.2]) by smtp.ott.qnx.com (8.8.8/8.6.12) with SMTP id MAA24621 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2003 12:01:00 -0400 Message-ID: <066601c37c6b$d2b02550$0202040a@catdog> From: "Kris Warkentin" To: "Gdb@Sources.Redhat.Com" Subject: gdb GNATS database Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 16:01:00 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00198.txt.bz2 Who is responsible for the bug database? We were bit by PR:1291 and I wouldn't mind taking ownership of it. The patch included with the PR works for gcc 3.x but not 2.95x. We solved the problem for the 2 series gcc and have generalized the patch to work with both compiler versions. I'll be preparing a patch for the head branch over the next little bit but I wanted to know if there was anything special to be done in relation to the PR. cheers, Kris