RE: A strange gcc behavior, and an argument against -Wno-unused

["Pierre Muller" <muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr>]

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : gdb-owner@sourceware.org [mailto:gdb-owner@sourceware.org] De la
> part de Pedro Alves
> Envoyé : Tuesday, October 13, 2009 4:10 PM
> À : gdb@sourceware.org; Eli Zaretskii
> Cc : tromey@redhat.com; dave.korn.cygwin@googlemail.com;
> msnyder@vmware.com
> Objet : Re: A strange gcc behavior, and an argument against -Wno-unused
> 
> Since Michael has committed his patch meanwhile, in the
> interest of moving a bit forward, how 'bout we give this a
> try, then?  No new warnings caught on an
> 'x86_64-linux --enable-targets=all' at -O2 build.


  Isn't this going to make troubles if
a standard function is defined as a pascal procedure
i. e. with return type (void) in most implementation
but returning something else on some "exotic" system?

  I thought there were some examples
but can't remember any exact ones :(
  Maybe related to signals?


Pierre Muller
Pascal language support maintainer for GDB