From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id ODKcOqJtNWR8uygAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 10:24:34 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id EDDDE1E223; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 10:24:34 -0400 (EDT) Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=sourceware.org header.i=@sourceware.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=I+BM4v8C; dkim-atps=neutral X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6510B1E15D for ; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 10:24:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35C463858C66 for ; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 14:24:33 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 35C463858C66 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1681223073; bh=Cg2tSIzLdlpy+HYXqioM/7mhgpH6SNq+5wPouiNWLDo=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From:Reply-To:From; b=I+BM4v8CwqaAXceU4ckRWNbi+xFpVk35LbVJGF973BuhNcgNHC9xfjxdue3P5tI0N ZjciAd1isrBPlc7rBiyTodgQijKvPQ0uUJGid5LC6VGUqcxEX5Z7+xvlyF1KkHAyk3 Ngzo7GvkmexDu7vGR9j2TFK5btescRyN3B7tQrFQ= Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DC353858D28; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 14:23:06 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 9DC353858D28 Received: from [172.16.0.192] (192-222-143-198.qc.cable.ebox.net [192.222.143.198]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C86661E110; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 10:23:05 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <03bbbbff-5bcc-3fa8-a5e9-9b9cbd541f06@simark.ca> Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2023 10:23:05 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.9.1 Subject: Re: RFC: Adding a SECURITY.md document to the Binutils Content-Language: fr To: Nick Clifton , Eli Zaretskii Cc: binutils@sourceware.org, siddhesh@gotplt.org, gdb@sourceware.org References: <1c38b926-e003-0e21-e7f1-3d5dbec2aabf@redhat.com> <838rf4ou73.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Simon Marchi via Gdb Reply-To: Simon Marchi Errors-To: gdb-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb" On 4/11/23 09:29, Nick Clifton via Gdb wrote: > Hi Eli, > >> Thanks. A minor nit: does it have to be a .md file? Can it be a .txt >> file instead? > > Sure - no problem. In fact until you asked I just assumed that .md == .txt. > But I see no need for any markup capabilities so using .txt files is fine with me. FWIW, I like .md files, they read well as just text, but are also displayed nicely when viewed in contexts like git web views. I don't see any downsides to using it. Simon