From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15996 invoked by alias); 4 Dec 2002 03:08:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 15988 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2002 03:08:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO fenway.scenix.com) (4.20.168.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 4 Dec 2002 03:08:53 -0000 Received: from nkelseyxp (NKELSEY-XP [192.168.1.246]) by fenway.scenix.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2656.59) id YCGZVTPW; Tue, 3 Dec 2002 19:08:00 -0800 Message-ID: <039901c29b42$78f38fd0$f601a8c0@nkelseyxp> Reply-To: "Jafa" From: "Jafa" To: Subject: recent changes to frame pointer handling on trunk? Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2002 19:08:00 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00066.txt.bz2 Hi guys, I am working from the gdb trunk and the ip2k port of gdb. I have been running a trunk snapshot from about 4 weeks ago and when asked for the frame-pointer I go and figure it out (the fp isn't normally stored by the c-compiler). I just updated to the trunk and now the frames are all wrong. What I am seeing is that my code figures the FP out correctly (for example SP+10) but instead of looking for the first parameter at FP+0, it looks for the first parameter at FP+10. Does this make any sense to anyone? Thanks Nick