From: Eric Brunel <eric.brunel@pragmadev.com>
To: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Variable read time * 3+ between program compiled w/ gcc 2.95 and w/ gcc 3.2 on Solaris
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 14:39:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <03042416451601.01259@eb.pragmadev> (raw)
Hi all,
I don't know if the following problem belongs here or in the gcc
newsgroup: we've noticed a drastic loss of performance when reading
program variables from gdb between the versions 2.95.3 and 3.2.2 of
gcc on Solaris 2.7. Here is a short example showing the problem:
--foo.cpp---------------
int x;
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
x = 12;
return 0;
}
------------------------
I then compile this program using g++ 2.95.3 and 3.2.2 into the
binaries foo2 and foo3 resp. Then I run:
gdb -batch -x gdb.cmds fooN
with the following commands file:
--gdb.cmds--------------
break foo.cpp:6
run
print x
print x
... (200 times)
print x
quit
-------------------------
Here are typical results:
$ time gdb -batch -x gdb.cmds foo2 > /dev/null
real 0m0.564s
user 0m0.150s
sys 0m0.110s
$ time gdb -batch -x gdb.cmds foo3 > /dev/null
real 0m1.726s
user 0m1.340s
sys 0m0.260s
The reading time has been increased by a factor 3+. This is even worse
if the variable is a structure and if I access fields in it. With a
chained list read via x->next->next->next..., we got times around
.5/.75 seconds with g++ 2.95, and more than 30 seconds (!) with g++
3.2
We tested versions 5.2 and 5.3 of gdb and got similar results.
Is this a bug? Is it known? Is there a workaround or a patch? Thanks a
lot in advance.
--
- Eric Brunel <eric.brunel@pragmadev.com> -
PragmaDev : Real Time Software Development Tools - http://www.pragmadev.com
next reply other threads:[~2003-04-24 14:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-24 14:39 Eric Brunel [this message]
2003-04-24 14:52 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-04-28 8:40 ` Eric Brunel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=03042416451601.01259@eb.pragmadev \
--to=eric.brunel@pragmadev.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox