From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 614 invoked by alias); 20 May 2005 18:30:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 561 invoked from network); 20 May 2005 18:30:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO romy.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.66) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 20 May 2005 18:30:27 -0000 Received: from zaretski (IGLD-83-130-247-87.inter.net.il [83.130.247.87]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.8-GR) with ESMTP id BHA03829 (AUTH halo1); Fri, 20 May 2005 21:30:10 +0300 (IDT) Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 18:30:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: Vladimir Prus , gdb@sources.redhat.com Message-ID: <01c55d69$Blat.v2.4$9faea7e0@zahav.net.il> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 In-reply-to: <20050520181415.GB2499@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Fri, 20 May 2005 14:14:15 -0400) Subject: Re: [discuss] Support for reverse-execution Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <00c601c55747$860a3e80$aaa56b80@msnyder8600> <01c55d54$Blat.v2.4$50872f80@zahav.net.il> <20050520181415.GB2499@nevyn.them.org> X-SW-Source: 2005-05/txt/msg00228.txt.bz2 > Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 14:14:15 -0400 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > Cc: Vladimir Prus , gdb@sources.redhat.com > > On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 06:54:13PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > From: Vladimir Prus > > > Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 18:45:22 +0400 > > > > > > Would not it be better to have a single "reverse" command which puts the > > > debugger in "reverse" mode -- making step/stepi/next/nexti go backward. > > > > Daniel, I rest my case ;-) > > I don't rest mine :-) I admit I was a little surprised to see someone > else suggest it, but I still think it's an awful idea as a user > interface. Just to clarify: ``my case'' was not to suggest to add this feature, but that someone some day might suggest to add it, and that such a suggestion might be accepted.