From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22791 invoked by alias); 20 May 2005 15:58:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 22757 invoked from network); 20 May 2005 15:57:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO romy.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.66) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 20 May 2005 15:57:57 -0000 Received: from zaretski (IGLD-83-130-247-87.inter.net.il [83.130.247.87]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.8-GR) with ESMTP id BGZ12873 (AUTH halo1); Fri, 20 May 2005 18:57:37 +0300 (IDT) Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 15:58:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: Vladimir Prus Message-ID: <01c55d54$Blat.v2.4$50872f80@zahav.net.il> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 CC: gdb@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: (message from Vladimir Prus on Fri, 20 May 2005 18:45:22 +0400) Subject: Re: [discuss] Support for reverse-execution Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <00c601c55747$860a3e80$aaa56b80@msnyder8600> X-SW-Source: 2005-05/txt/msg00224.txt.bz2 > From: Vladimir Prus > Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 18:45:22 +0400 > > Would not it be better to have a single "reverse" command which puts the > debugger in "reverse" mode -- making step/stepi/next/nexti go backward. Daniel, I rest my case ;-)