From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17578 invoked by alias); 1 May 2005 19:55:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 17283 invoked from network); 1 May 2005 19:55:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO romy.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.66) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 1 May 2005 19:55:42 -0000 Received: from zaretski (IGLD-80-230-71-109.inter.net.il [80.230.71.109]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.6-GR) with ESMTP id BCR66064 (AUTH halo1); Sun, 1 May 2005 22:53:10 +0300 (IDT) Date: Sun, 01 May 2005 19:55:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: Kris Warkentin Message-ID: <01c54e87$Blat.v2.4$40320aa0@zahav.net.il> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 CC: me@cgf.cx, mark@codesourcery.com, paul@codesourcery.com, gdb@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <427267B7.8020107@qnx.com> (message from Kris Warkentin on Fri, 29 Apr 2005 12:58:31 -0400) Subject: Re: Windows support in GDB Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <200504291513.j3TFDhjx021040@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20050429153146.GA27362@nevyn.them.org> <20050429160040.GH10017@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <42726061.5090101@qnx.com> <20050429163011.GB12864@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <427267B7.8020107@qnx.com> X-SW-Source: 2005-05/txt/msg00003.txt.bz2 > Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 12:58:31 -0400 > From: Kris Warkentin > CC: mark@codesourcery.com, paul@codesourcery.com, gdb@sourceware.org > > It isn't just an issue of gdb not working with native paths because, > as you say, it _usually_ does. It's a question of consistency. Indeed. In fact, any serious use of GDB will almost instantly bump into such a consistency (or lack thereof) issue. For example, will the `edit' and `shell' commands work if I don't have a Cygwin Bash installed and GDB is configured to invoke that Bash as the shell?