From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-21136-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 31008 invoked by alias); 6 Apr 2005 03:51:07 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 30965 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2005 03:50:59 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO romy.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.66)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 6 Apr 2005 03:50:59 -0000
Received: from zaretski (IGLD-80-230-67-97.inter.net.il [80.230.67.97])
	by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.6-GR)
	with ESMTP id AXM33427 (AUTH halo1);
	Wed, 6 Apr 2005 06:50:57 +0300 (IDT)
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 03:51:00 -0000
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@gnu.org>
To: GDB <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <01c53a5b$Blat.v2.4$627fba20@zahav.net.il>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
In-reply-to: <20050406021259.GB9146@white> (message from Bob Rossi on Tue, 5
	Apr 2005 22:12:59 -0400)
Subject: Re: [mi] watchpoint-scope exec async command
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
References: <20050329020123.GA7266@nevyn.them.org> <01c534a6$Blat.v2.4$944e44a0@zahav.net.il> <20050329214414.GA3498@nevyn.them.org> <01c53564$Blat.v2.4$1da3c140@zahav.net.il> <20050331014749.GA264@white> <01c535ab$Blat.v2.4$c21baac0@zahav.net.il> <20050331205826.GA1590@white> <01c5369a$Blat.v2.4$2f0a6100@zahav.net.il> <20050401141105.GB29152@nevyn.them.org> <01c53769$Blat.v2.4$83bfb540@zahav.net.il> <20050406021259.GB9146@white>
X-SW-Source: 2005-04/txt/msg00039.txt.bz2

> Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 22:12:59 -0400
> From: Bob Rossi <bob@brasko.net>
> Cc: GDB <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
> 
> Eli or Daneil, if either of you can decide which solution is correct,
> I'll look into fixing the problem. It just so happens that this bug
> doesn't really effect me in any way. I just happened to notice it when
> trying to enumerate many of the possibilities in GDB/MI.
> 
> Would it be good if I entered a bug report? or should i just forget
> about this?

It's best if you picked one of the two alternatives and implemented
it.  I can approve changes to breakpoint.c, so if the patch is good,
it will go in.

TIA