From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Bob Rossi <bob@brasko.net>
Cc: bpisupat@cs.indiana.edu, gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: MI starting guide
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2005 17:13:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <01c52726$Blat.v2.4$82600ae0@zahav.net.il> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050312144054.GA18379@white> (message from Bob Rossi on Sat, 12 Mar 2005 09:40:54 -0500)
> Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2005 09:40:54 -0500
> From: Bob Rossi <bob@brasko.net>
> Cc: bpisupat@cs.indiana.edu, gdb@sources.redhat.com
>
> Honestly Eli, there are so many improvements that we could add, the sky
> is the limit. In fact, I have several ideas of improving the MI
> interface doco, of course, none of this will get done if the patch review
> time issue isn't resolved.
There's no need to wait for the patch review issue to get resolved.
Since I'm the area maintainer for the documentation, I can approve
doco patches myself. And I usually review such patches the moment I
read them.
> - obviously a section on 'asycnronous' MI interface, which I still
> don't understand the purpose of (since I can't get any of the
> asynchronous commands to work)
> - make sure that the documented "example" commands section stay up
> to date with what GDB actually outputs. I have a funny feeling that
> many of the commands do not actually output the same info anymore.
> (we could generate the example data from a testsuite case, and diff
> what GDB currently outputs to what it is supposed to output to
> make sure the data doesn't change)
> - Document what MI commands are implemented/unimplemented
> - Document the correct MI output command grammar (which is almost
> correct, but not really)
> - Somehow document what versions each command was introduced in
> - A developers howto guide (Although, I think the reference
> implementation I was talking about would be a better way to
> describe this)
> - Document what MI fields are mandatory output for a command, and
> which ones are optional.
These are all good ideas, so feel free. I suggest to pick up some
aspect of MI that you know best, or that doesn't require a too deep
knowledge of the implementation (e.g., the implemented/unimplemented
thing), and start with that.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-12 17:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-11 23:48 Bhanu Nagendra Pisupati
2005-03-12 0:05 ` Bob Rossi
2005-03-12 10:30 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-03-12 14:40 ` Bob Rossi
2005-03-12 17:13 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='01c52726$Blat.v2.4$82600ae0@zahav.net.il' \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=bob@brasko.net \
--cc=bpisupat@cs.indiana.edu \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox