From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31637 invoked by alias); 6 Jan 2005 04:48:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 31532 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2005 04:48:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO legolas.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.24) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 6 Jan 2005 04:48:05 -0000 Received: from zaretski (IGLD-83-130-250-9.inter.net.il [83.130.250.9]) by legolas.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.6-GR) with ESMTP id DLX40031 (AUTH halo1); Thu, 6 Jan 2005 06:47:52 +0200 (IST) Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 04:48:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: Bob Rossi Message-ID: <01c4f3aa$Blat.v2.2.2$b4217d20@zahav.net.il> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 CC: mec.gnu@mindspring.com, jingham@apple.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <20050105232657.GB27494@white> (message from Bob Rossi on Wed, 5 Jan 2005 18:26:57 -0500) Subject: Re: GDB/MI Output Syntax Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <1093622671.2836.ezmlm@sources.redhat.com> <76E69B58-F852-11D8-8E70-000A958F4C44@apple.com> <412F87A4.nail3LU117EOV@mindspring.com> <20050105232657.GB27494@white> X-SW-Source: 2005-01/txt/msg00050.txt.bz2 > Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 18:26:57 -0500 > From: Bob Rossi > Cc: jingham@apple.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com > > 1. will the grammar and bison syntax be good to document so that others can see it? I think it's enough to point to the grammar definition file in the MI docs. There's no need to do more in the docs; the grammar should document itself. > 3. Would a patch like this be acceptable even if it was accomplished? Why not?