From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-20322-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 29358 invoked by alias); 7 Dec 2004 21:47:35 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 29335 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2004 21:47:31 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO legolas.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.24)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 7 Dec 2004 21:47:31 -0000
Received: from zaretski (pns03-209-212.inter.net.il [80.230.209.212])
	by legolas.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.5-GR)
	with ESMTP id DHC06030 (AUTH halo1);
	Tue, 7 Dec 2004 23:47:10 +0200 (IST)
Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 21:47:00 -0000
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Bob Rossi <bob@brasko.net>
Message-ID: <01c4dca6$Blat.v2.2.2$806fa9e0@zahav.net.il>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
CC: kostik@ispras.ru, gdb@sources.redhat.com
In-reply-to: <20041207195019.GB12487@white> (message from Bob Rossi on Tue, 7
	Dec 2004 14:50:19 -0500)
Subject: Re: complete GDB MI specification
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
References: <3616850089.20041129165854@ispras.ru> <41AB43C8.7050500@gnu.org> <13730878711.20041129205245@ispras.ru> <18220744048.20041206192130@ispras.ru> <01c4dbd6$Blat.v2.2.2$0b225460@zahav.net.il> <429477215.20041207214436@ispras.ru> <20041207185849.GA12487@white> <01c4dc95$Blat.v2.2.2$63201020@zahav.net.il> <20041207195019.GB12487@white>
X-SW-Source: 2004-12/txt/msg00047.txt.bz2

> Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 14:50:19 -0500
> From: Bob Rossi <bob@brasko.net>
> Cc: kostik@ispras.ru, gdb@sources.redhat.com
> 
> What I meant to say was, It would be helpful if there was a place in the
> GDB manual that had all of the MI commands for specific versions of MI,
> and all of the fields that the MI command is capable of outputting.
> Basically, the semantic information needed to write a parser and quickly
> interpret the MI commands as correct or incorrect output, and what each
> field means.

Such information, if we decide to include it, should go into
gdbint.texinfo.

But basically, I think that once the Yacc parser is written and
becomes part of GDB, we should maintain the parser instead of
documenting the grammar.