From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29756 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2004 20:41:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 29722 invoked from network); 23 Nov 2004 20:40:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO legolas.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.24) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 23 Nov 2004 20:40:59 -0000 Received: from zaretski ([80.230.156.45]) by legolas.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.5-GR) with ESMTP id DEJ47743 (AUTH halo1); Tue, 23 Nov 2004 22:40:42 +0200 (IST) Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 20:45:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: "Bloch, Jack" Message-ID: <01c4d19c$Blat.v2.2.2$75bc6200@zahav.net.il> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 CC: ac131313@redhat.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <13272676F5725D4397BD0E6A11C84968046D6D4B@stca208a.bus.sc.rolm.com> (jack.bloch@siemens.com) Subject: Re: new option --readnever & script gstack? Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <13272676F5725D4397BD0E6A11C84968046D6D4B@stca208a.bus.sc.rolm.com> X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg00227.txt.bz2 > From: "Bloch, Jack" > Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com > Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 08:32:01 -0800 > > The pstack GDB option is not the most useful. Can you tell why not?