From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32350 invoked by alias); 16 Nov 2004 21:11:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 32098 invoked from network); 16 Nov 2004 21:11:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO legolas.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.24) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 16 Nov 2004 21:11:09 -0000 Received: from zaretski ([80.230.147.231]) by legolas.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.5-GR) with ESMTP id DCU44122 (AUTH halo1); Tue, 16 Nov 2004 23:10:55 +0200 (IST) Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 21:48:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: Ian Lance Taylor Message-ID: <01c4cc20$Blat.v2.2.2$9770fa40@zahav.net.il> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 CC: cagney@gnu.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: (message from Ian Lance Taylor on 16 Nov 2004 12:35:28 -0500) Subject: Re: GDB is the GNU project's native debugger Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <419A2E2F.5010602@gnu.org> X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg00175.txt.bz2 > From: Ian Lance Taylor > Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com > Date: 16 Nov 2004 12:35:28 -0500 > > For example, it would be easy to use this statement as the motivation > for removing features required for using gdb for embedded systems, or > on Windows. I don't think that would be appropriate. > > If you want to state that, where there is a direct and immediate > conflict between the needs of GNU systems and the needs of other > systems, the needs of the GNU systems take priority, I could support > that. > > If you want to state that this applies to considerations of resources, > and of which parts of gdb to mark obsolescent, I could not support > that. I agree with Ian 100%, on all 3 accounts.