From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-20150-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 1699 invoked by alias); 15 Nov 2004 04:45:13 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 1399 invoked from network); 15 Nov 2004 04:45:08 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO legolas.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.24)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 15 Nov 2004 04:45:08 -0000
Received: from zaretski ([80.230.158.116])
	by legolas.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.5-GR)
	with ESMTP id DCL81460 (AUTH halo1);
	Mon, 15 Nov 2004 06:44:22 +0200 (IST)
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 16:06:00 -0000
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
Message-ID: <01c4cacd$Blat.v2.2.2$9f8338a0@zahav.net.il>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
CC: tromey@redhat.com, drow@false.org, otto.wyss@orpatec.ch,
        gdb@sources.redhat.com
In-reply-to: <je6548dny4.fsf@sykes.suse.de> (message from Andreas Schwab on
	Mon, 15 Nov 2004 00:13:07 +0100)
Subject: Re: GDB doesn't show the correct line
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
References: <40D5E480.4A68163@orpatec.ch>
	<20040620202929.GA17216@nevyn.them.org> <40D7212F.E68A9D61@orpatec.ch>
	<20040621175928.GA13407@nevyn.them.org> <40D725AF.FC2AAF3A@orpatec.ch>
	<20041113201803.GA21320@nevyn.them.org>
	<01c4c9c9$Blat.v2.2.2$913fbf20@zahav.net.il>
	<20041113214612.GA30909@nevyn.them.org>
	<m3pt2hyp6h.fsf@localhost.localdomain>
	<01c4ca89$Blat.v2.2.2$e9842b60@zahav.net.il>
	<jelld49l9v.fsf@sykes.suse.de>
	<01c4ca99$Blat.v2.2.2$124c16c0@zahav.net.il>
	<je6548dny4.fsf@sykes.suse.de>
X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg00143.txt.bz2

> Cc: tromey@redhat.com, drow@false.org, otto.wyss@orpatec.ch,
> 	gdb@sources.redhat.com
> From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
> Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 00:13:07 +0100
> 
> Because they look like non-canonical line endings, but can be interpreted
> as two line endings when using a strict interpretation.  The first one
> could be a Unix newline followed by a Mac newline, or a non-canonical DOS
> newline (should non-canonical DOS newlines be recognized?).  The second
> one could be a Mac newline followed by a DOS newline, or a spurious CR
> followed by a DOS newline (should spurious CRs be ignored?).

If we support \r Mac-style newlines, then (see Felix's message in this
thread), we cannot support non-canonical line-endings and we cannot
ignore spurious CRs.