From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-20137-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 4257 invoked by alias); 13 Nov 2004 21:43:39 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 4234 invoked from network); 13 Nov 2004 21:43:33 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO balder.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.15)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 13 Nov 2004 21:43:33 -0000
Received: from zaretski ([80.230.158.138])
	by balder.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.3.7-GR)
	with ESMTP id DWC21950 (AUTH halo1);
	Sat, 13 Nov 2004 23:42:46 +0200 (IST)
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 21:46:00 -0000
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
Message-ID: <01c4c9c9$Blat.v2.2.2$913fbf20@zahav.net.il>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
CC: otto.wyss@orpatec.ch, gdb@sources.redhat.com
In-reply-to: <20041113201803.GA21320@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel
	Jacobowitz on Sat, 13 Nov 2004 15:18:03 -0500)
Subject: Re: GDB doesn't show the correct line
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
References: <40D5E480.4A68163@orpatec.ch> <20040620202929.GA17216@nevyn.them.org> <40D7212F.E68A9D61@orpatec.ch> <20040621175928.GA13407@nevyn.them.org> <40D725AF.FC2AAF3A@orpatec.ch> <20041113201803.GA21320@nevyn.them.org>
X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg00130.txt.bz2

> Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 15:18:03 -0500
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
> 
> It's no one's fault, I think.  I tracked down the problem.  You have
> mixed newline conventions in the file: mostly "\n" as a line separator,
> but in some places just "\r".  GCC treats this as a line break for
> legacy reasons (MacOS).  'less' doesn't, which really confused me while
> trying to debug the problem.  GDB doesn't, either.
> 
> Should GDB?  I have no idea.

As of today, GDB should treat \r\n (a.k.a. CR-LF) line endings
correctly, but not sole \r.  Perhaps we should amend that code to
treat sole CRs as well.

> But it's easiest to just fix the source file to be consistent.

Indeed.