From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19020 invoked by alias); 20 Oct 2004 04:52:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 19013 invoked from network); 20 Oct 2004 04:52:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO legolas.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.24) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 20 Oct 2004 04:52:14 -0000 Received: from zaretski ([80.230.149.128]) by legolas.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.3-GR) with ESMTP id CWX86804 (AUTH halo1); Wed, 20 Oct 2004 06:52:08 +0200 (IST) Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 15:11:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: Andrew Cagney Message-ID: <01c4b660$Blat.v2.2.2$193a8e00@zahav.net.il> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 CC: kettenis@gnu.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <41759B30.3070907@gnu.org> (message from Andrew Cagney on Tue, 19 Oct 2004 18:54:40 -0400) Subject: Re: Trimming the CVS "gdb" module Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <416420FF.2090201@gnu.org> <01c4ad13$Blat.v2.2.2$f1f70c60@zahav.net.il> <416C34EE.1000504@gnu.org> <01c4b0e0$Blat.v2.2.2$c0d0f8a0@zahav.net.il> <200410131535.i9DFZ8Sb020582@juw15.nfra.nl> <01c4b162$Blat.v2.2.2$6fa656a0@zahav.net.il> <4175221A.8040006@gnu.org> <01c4b617$Blat.v2.2.2$89156400@zahav.net.il> <41759B30.3070907@gnu.org> X-SW-Source: 2004-10/txt/msg00371.txt.bz2 > Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 18:54:40 -0400 > From: Andrew Cagney > Cc: kettenis@gnu.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com > > Are there any current GNU systems that have this problem? I don't know. I was talking about non-GNU systems, since you said that GNU systems always come with gettext. > Are there any current non-GNU systems have this problem? Any non-GNU system where there's no gettext installed would be affected. All the Unix and Windows boxes I'm working on are like that. > PS: Up to and including 6.2, GDB didn't even need intl/ yet it was > bundling it. It was an artifact inherited from the Cygnus tree. Like I said, I'm not opposed to what you did if we intend to add it back at some future date, when GDB will support gettext and message catalogs. What worries me is that it sounds like we intend to remove the i18n stuff for good.