From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10619 invoked by alias); 2 Oct 2004 17:06:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 10607 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2004 17:06:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO legolas.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.24) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 2 Oct 2004 17:06:23 -0000 Received: from zaretski ([80.230.152.240]) by legolas.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.3-GR) with ESMTP id CSS97447 (AUTH halo1); Sat, 2 Oct 2004 19:06:05 +0200 (IST) Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 17:24:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: Bob Rossi Message-ID: <01c4a8a1$Blat.v2.2.2$d5778f40@zahav.net.il> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 CC: gdb@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <20041002162822.GD5224@white> (message from Bob Rossi on Sat, 2 Oct 2004 12:28:22 -0400) Subject: Re: MI and backwards compatibility Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20041001142517.GD4100@white> <01c4a89c$Blat.v2.2.2$40bcdc20@zahav.net.il> <20041002162822.GD5224@white> X-SW-Source: 2004-10/txt/msg00022.txt.bz2 > Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2004 12:28:22 -0400 > From: Bob Rossi > Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com > > Are you saying that the goal of GDB is to be backwards compatible with > old MI protocols? In general, yes. (Although perhaps we should do a better job.) > If so, I need the documentation of all of these protocols. I need to > know how to implement an MI1 protocol, MI2 protocol, ... I think I answered this in my other message in this thread.