From: "Kris Warkentin" <kewarken@qnx.com>
To: <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: deferred breakpoints
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 21:36:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <016801c2dd16$862cb0d0$2a00a8c0@dash> (raw)
I took a look at the sources from apple and it looks like what they're doing
is relatively simple. I think most of the wiring is already in gdb.
1) Attempt to set break. If that fails:
2) Create a raw breakpoint and set it to be shlib_disabled. That way gdb
attempts to reset it every time a shlib is loaded.
I believe that you might get a lot of error messages with this method when
gdb complains about not being able to set the breakpoints but I may be
wrong. The relevant code is below. Interesting. I'll see if I can do it
with a newer version (the apple source is for gdb-4.18)
cheers,
Kris
struct symtab_and_line sal =
{0, 0};
struct breakpoint *b = set_raw_breakpoint (sal);
printf_unfiltered
("Will attempt to resolve \"%s\" on future dynamic loads.\n", args);
b->number = ++breakpoint_count;
b->addr_string = savestring (args, strlen (args));
b->enable = shlib_disabled;
b->inserted = 0;
b->disposition = donttouch;
b->type = bp_breakpoint;
if (modify_breakpoint_hook)
modify_breakpoint_hook (b);
> How difficult do you think deferred breakpoints would be to implement? We
> have a customer who does a lot of work with shared objects and they'd like
> to be able to set breakpoints in them and have them persist across runs.
> I'm thinking that creating a list of breakpoints that could be run through
> every time a shared object was loaded would do the trick. Can anyone
point
> out any obvious gotcha's?
>
> Kris
>
next reply other threads:[~2003-02-25 21:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-02-25 21:36 Kris Warkentin [this message]
2003-02-25 21:59 ` Jason Molenda
2003-02-26 2:22 ` Kris Warkentin
2003-02-26 2:26 ` gdb detach Smita
2003-02-26 4:47 ` deferred breakpoints Jason Molenda
2003-02-26 16:51 ` Kris Warkentin
[not found] <1046355813.623.ezmlm@sources.redhat.com>
2003-03-01 2:16 ` Jim Ingham
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-02-25 20:51 Kris Warkentin
2003-02-25 20:57 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='016801c2dd16$862cb0d0$2a00a8c0@dash' \
--to=kewarken@qnx.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox