From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20368 invoked by alias); 20 Aug 2009 06:54:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 20280 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Aug 2009 06:54:42 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from oden.vtab.com (HELO oden.vtab.com) (62.20.90.195) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 06:54:32 +0000 Received: from oden.vtab.com (oden.vtab.com [127.0.0.1]) by oden.vtab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C2B826EF2D; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 08:54:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from polhem (unknown [62.20.90.206]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by oden.vtab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E75526EE17; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 08:54:28 +0200 (CEST) From: "Jakob Engblom" To: , "'Pedro Alves'" Cc: , "'Michael Snyder'" References: <002001ca1f0e$4c9b74a0$e5d25de0$@com> <200908171251.07179.pedro@codesourcery.com> <024f01ca209e$02d81e40$08885ac0$@com> <200908191328.57310.pedro@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: gdb reverse execution: how to actually run tests for it? Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 13:10:00 -0000 Message-ID: <016201ca2163$11e994c0$35bcbe40$@com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-08/txt/msg00196.txt.bz2 > Pedro> For the generic reverse execution tests --- reverse step, reverse > Pedro> next, reverse continue, run to breakpoint in reverse, etc., etc., > Pedro> I'd must prefer that we would get rid of the need for board files > Pedro> at all. :-) >=20 > Pedro> 1. for native targets, the only reverse solution we currently sup= port is > Pedro> precord. I can't see why we can't default to testing the reverse tests > Pedro> with precord then. >=20 > I agree. >=20 > If the tests aren't enabled by default on some common platforms and thus > run as a regular part of testing, you can be sure there will be > regressions here. So the question here is: who will deal with removing the board file depende= ncy? I don't think we and our consultants doing the work for us are competent enough... So is it OK if we submit a kit of tests which are structured in the same wa= y as the current reverse tests? Then we can deal with upgrading the tests later,= once the board file requirements has been fixed? Best regards, /jakob _______________________________________________________ Jakob Engblom, PhD, Technical Marketing Manager Virtutech=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 Direct: +46= 8 690 07 47=A0=A0=A0 Drottningholmsv=E4gen 22=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 Mobile: +46 709 242 646=A0=A0 11243 Stockholm=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 Web:=A0=A0=A0 www.virtu= tech.com=A0 Sweden ________________________________________________________ =A0=20