From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5845 invoked by alias); 24 Apr 2008 16:25:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 5772 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Apr 2008 16:25:35 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.ashling.com (HELO ashling.com) (62.77.186.162) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Apr 2008 16:24:59 +0000 Received: from Syam ([192.168.10.57]) by ashling.com (ashling.com [127.0.0.1]) (MDaemon PRO v9.6.5) with ESMTP id md50000998353.msg for ; Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:24:54 +0100 X-Spam-Processed: ashling.com, Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:24:54 +0100 (not processed: message from trusted or authenticated source) X-MDRemoteIP: 192.168.10.57 X-Return-Path: jiju.george@nestgroup.net X-Envelope-From: jiju.george@nestgroup.net X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: gdb@sources.redhat.com From: "Jiju George T" To: "'Daniel Jacobowitz'" Cc: References: <005101c8a52a$13f76910$390aa8c0@ashmicro.ashling.com> <20080423114537.GA15843@caradoc.them.org> <00a601c8a541$1194f090$390aa8c0@ashmicro.ashling.com> <20080423125717.GA20157@caradoc.them.org> Subject: RE: clearing call stack when a new binary file is loaded Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 16:34:00 -0000 Message-ID: <012201c8a627$ba2b62c0$390aa8c0@ashmicro.ashling.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-reply-to: <20080423125717.GA20157@caradoc.them.org> X-MDAV-Processed: ashling.com, Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:24:55 +0100 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-04/txt/msg00209.txt.bz2 Will it be fixed in the next release? Do I have to file a bug on this? -----Original Message----- From: 'Daniel Jacobowitz' [mailto:drow@false.org] Sent: 23 April 2008 13:57 To: Jiju George T Cc: 'Vladimir Prus'; gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: clearing call stack when a new binary file is loaded On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 01:53:46PM +0100, Jiju George T wrote: > Is there any equivalent mi command to invalidate the frame cache? No. If you use GDB 6.8 the CLI command "flushregs" will hack around the problem but we simply need to fix it. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery