From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23414 invoked by alias); 8 Apr 2003 18:35:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 23403 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2003 18:35:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hydra.ubicom.com) (4.20.168.98) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 8 Apr 2003 18:35:08 -0000 Received: FROM fenway.scenix.com BY hydra.ubicom.com ; Tue Apr 08 11:33:47 2003 -0700 Received: from nkelseyxp (bt-access-poin-.scenix.com [192.168.1.246]) by fenway.scenix.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2656.59) id 2NKW32CN; Tue, 8 Apr 2003 11:35:06 -0700 Message-ID: <00c801c2fdfd$68a82b40$f601a8c0@scenix.com> Reply-To: "Jafa" From: "Jafa" To: Subject: Frame handling Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2003 18:35:00 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg00073.txt.bz2 Hi all, I am working on the ip2k port of GDB. It has been stable for some time now but I ran out of time to get it reviewed before I went on holiday and now I am trying to bring it up to date with the trunk again. I merged with the trunk on March 17 - big mistake... frame handling was cauing big problems.... looked like a partical update to a new approach. I have just checked out the trunk today and it looks like a number of the ports are using the new frame handling approach. Is the trunk considered ok ATM or is the frame handling still in unstable daily development? What port would you recommend for reference for frame handling? The MIPS port is using deprecated frame functions. BTW - The stack-backtraces have a second problem as well... GDB is ment to stop at 'main' but the symbol lookup fails. In the applications that I am testing the symbol 'main' is a weak alias and this seams to be a general problem in the symbol lookup. I would appreciate your advice. Thanks Nick