From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-14957-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 31820 invoked by alias); 30 Jul 2003 21:43:16 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 31812 invoked from network); 30 Jul 2003 21:43:15 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail-out1.apple.com) (17.254.0.52)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 30 Jul 2003 21:43:15 -0000
Received: from mailgate2.apple.com (A17-129-100-225.apple.com [17.129.100.225])
	by mail-out1.apple.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h6ULh0iB009000
	for <gdb@sources.redhat.com>; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 14:43:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from scv3.apple.com (scv3.apple.com) by mailgate2.apple.com
 (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.2.1) with ESMTP id <T63c0126927118164e13e0@mailgate2.apple.com>;
 Wed, 30 Jul 2003 14:43:14 -0700
Received: from apple.com (vpn-scv-x3-11.apple.com [17.219.194.11])
	by scv3.apple.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h6ULgw0K017834;
	Wed, 30 Jul 2003 14:42:58 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 21:43:00 -0000
Subject: Re: Two possible function stabs patches
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v552)
Cc: drow@mvista.com, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com
To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec@shout.net>
From: Geoffrey Keating <geoffk@apple.com>
In-Reply-To: <200307300547.h6U5l96b025163@duracef.shout.net>
Message-Id: <00B3555D-C2D7-11D7-941C-0050E4BAD278@apple.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2003-07/txt/msg00348.txt.bz2

[This might be a duplicate, in which case please ignore it...]

On Tuesday, July 29, 2003, at 10:47  PM, Michael Elizabeth Chastain 
wrote:

> First patch:
>
>   no regressions in gdb test suite output
>   no improvements, either
>   native i686-pc-linux-gnu
>   red hat linux 8
>   binutils 2.14
>   -gstabs+

Excellent!  Except, that probably means that the gdb testsuite could do 
with some more testcases.  Is there a GDB person who could add the one 
I mentioned earlier,

int main(void)
{
   static int foo(void)  { return 1; }
   return foo() == 1 ? 0 : 1;
}

break foo

?

> Second patch:
>
>   still running ...
>
> My test bed deletes the build directories for gcc after it builds
> each gcc, so I got to do a little extra build-from-scratch
> this evening.  Argh.
>
Thank you for all your work!