From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22169 invoked by alias); 23 Oct 2008 10:43:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 22159 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Oct 2008 10:43:45 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from dns.vtab.com (HELO oden.vtab.com) (62.20.90.195) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 10:42:49 +0000 Received: from oden.vtab.com (oden.vtab.com [127.0.0.1]) by oden.vtab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1228126EF40; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:42:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from polhem (polhem.hq.vtech [10.0.0.149]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by oden.vtab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD81C26EF23; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:42:43 +0200 (CEST) From: "Jakob Engblom" To: "'teawater'" , "'Michael Snyder'" , "'Daniel Jacobowitz'" , References: <48FBDA34.6020104@vmware.com> <007e01c9334e$aad56ff0$00804fd0$@com> <20081022133716.GA10237@caradoc.them.org> <48FF6C46.1020402@vmware.com> <011401c9347d$aa97a0f0$ffc6e2d0$@com> In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: [discuss] semantics, "replay debugging" vs. "reverse debugging" Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 10:43:00 -0000 Message-ID: <005301c934fc$139c40a0$3ad4c1e0$@com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Content-Language: sv X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-10/txt/msg00106.txt.bz2 > I heard some non-opensource implement of reverse. Do you have some > message about them? And Simics and VmWare I guess count to that, even if they talk to gdb. And Lauterbach and GreenHills hardware-based solutions. I would not be surprised if ARM also sneaks one out the door, they have the trace facilities in their cores to do it. /jakob