Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Mark" <vera0010@sina.com>
To: <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: GDB for Multiprocessor Architecture
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 03:32:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <004c01c3c1f3$6bf778e0$24bd5ada@markandonly> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3FCE2B59.50603@gnu.org>

If these CPUs share the same memories and run the same code image but different data, how about gdb does one-for-multithread debugging ? Shall I have multiple sessions of GDB, one per CPU? 

Mark
Thanks in advance

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Andrew Cagney" <cagney@gnu.org>
To: "Nitin Gupta" <nitin.gupta@nevisnetworks.com>
Cc: "Daniel Jacobowitz" <drow@mvista.com>; "Ian Lance Taylor" <ian@wasabisystems.com>; <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 2:28 AM
Subject: Re: GDB for Multiprocessor Architecture


> > Hi,
> > How can GDB be used to debug an application running on a chip that has n
> > number of similar CPUs. These CPUs share memories and run different code
> > images.
> > I plan to do a debugging session using the hardware probe and the GDB
> > remote protocol. My target does not have any OS support as Linux or
> > RTEMS but the host is a Linux box.
> > My question is how can I get to know that currently GDB is talking to
> > which CPU? Is it possible for me to do something like 
> > gdb> load image1.o
> > gdb> CPU=1
> > gdb> |get register contents|
> > gdb> load image2.o
> > gdb> CPU=3
> > gdb> |get register contents|
> > 
> > and such similar stuff.
> > 
> > One way of implementing this is using the thread model but then each CPU
> > has altogether different code image to execute. Shall I have multiple
> > sessions of GDB, one per CPU? But again if a debug exception is raised
> > say a breakpoint is hit, how will I know on the host side which CPU has
> > hit the breakpoint.
> > 
> > Has anybody done a similar task on any other target? Any help on this
> > fron shall be grateful.
> 
> CPU's can be modeled using GDB's thread framework.  However, at present 
> the model doesn't extend as far as modeling separate memory regions for 
> each CPU (something that needs to be fixed).
> 
> Andrew
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-12-14  3:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-12-03 14:07 Nitin Gupta
2003-12-03 18:28 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-12-05  7:28   ` Amit S. Kale
2003-12-14  3:32   ` Mark [this message]
2003-12-04 21:05 Nitin Gupta
2003-12-04 23:05 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-12-05 11:01 Nitin Gupta

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='004c01c3c1f3$6bf778e0$24bd5ada@markandonly' \
    --to=vera0010@sina.com \
    --cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox