From: "Mark" <vera0010@sina.com>
To: <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: GDB for Multiprocessor Architecture
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 03:32:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <004c01c3c1f3$6bf778e0$24bd5ada@markandonly> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3FCE2B59.50603@gnu.org>
If these CPUs share the same memories and run the same code image but different data, how about gdb does one-for-multithread debugging ? Shall I have multiple sessions of GDB, one per CPU?
Mark
Thanks in advance
----- Original Message -----
From: "Andrew Cagney" <cagney@gnu.org>
To: "Nitin Gupta" <nitin.gupta@nevisnetworks.com>
Cc: "Daniel Jacobowitz" <drow@mvista.com>; "Ian Lance Taylor" <ian@wasabisystems.com>; <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 2:28 AM
Subject: Re: GDB for Multiprocessor Architecture
> > Hi,
> > How can GDB be used to debug an application running on a chip that has n
> > number of similar CPUs. These CPUs share memories and run different code
> > images.
> > I plan to do a debugging session using the hardware probe and the GDB
> > remote protocol. My target does not have any OS support as Linux or
> > RTEMS but the host is a Linux box.
> > My question is how can I get to know that currently GDB is talking to
> > which CPU? Is it possible for me to do something like
> > gdb> load image1.o
> > gdb> CPU=1
> > gdb> |get register contents|
> > gdb> load image2.o
> > gdb> CPU=3
> > gdb> |get register contents|
> >
> > and such similar stuff.
> >
> > One way of implementing this is using the thread model but then each CPU
> > has altogether different code image to execute. Shall I have multiple
> > sessions of GDB, one per CPU? But again if a debug exception is raised
> > say a breakpoint is hit, how will I know on the host side which CPU has
> > hit the breakpoint.
> >
> > Has anybody done a similar task on any other target? Any help on this
> > fron shall be grateful.
>
> CPU's can be modeled using GDB's thread framework. However, at present
> the model doesn't extend as far as modeling separate memory regions for
> each CPU (something that needs to be fixed).
>
> Andrew
>
>
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-12-14 3:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-12-03 14:07 Nitin Gupta
2003-12-03 18:28 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-12-05 7:28 ` Amit S. Kale
2003-12-14 3:32 ` Mark [this message]
2003-12-04 21:05 Nitin Gupta
2003-12-04 23:05 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-12-05 11:01 Nitin Gupta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='004c01c3c1f3$6bf778e0$24bd5ada@markandonly' \
--to=vera0010@sina.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox