RE: debugger 6.2.1 misfeatures

["Monika Chaddha" <monika@acmet.com>]

Is it necessary to send test cases with the bug? I had sent the
following bug with patch some days ago but didn't get any response
regarding this. I don't have any test case till now to prove this bug as
it can be test only for remote target during tracing.
What should I do? Pls help.

Thanks & Regards
Monika

Defect report:-
-------------
File
-----
/src/sim/mips/m16.igen

Defects
--------

1. Mnemonic for CMP instruction is putted as

   "sltiu r<TRX>, r<TRY>"

   While it should be as

   "cmp r<TRX>, r<TRY>"

2. Mnemonic for CMPI instruction is putted as

   "sltiu r<TRX>, <IMMED>"

   While it should be as

   "cmpi r<TRX>, <IMMED>"

Patch
-----

GDB Version no:  6.0

File: /src/sim/mips/m16.igen

 11101,3.RX,3.RY,01010:RR:16::CMP
-"sltiu r<TRX>, r<TRY>"
+"cmp r<TRX>, r<TRY>"
 *mips16:
 *vr4100:
 {
   do_xor (SD_, TRX, TRY, T8IDX);
 }

 01110,3.RX,8.IMMED:RI:16::CMPI
-"sltiu r<TRX>, <IMMED>"
+"cmpi r<TRX>, <IMMED>"
 *mips16:
 *vr4100:
 {
   do_xori (SD_, TRX, T8IDX, IMMED);
 }

>-----Original Message-----
>From: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
[mailto:gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com] On
>Behalf Of Michael Chastain
>Sent: Saturday, September 11, 2004 7:17 AM
>To: gdb@sources.redhat.com; esp5@pge.com
>Subject: Re: debugger 6.2.1 misfeatures
>
>Sounds like a bug to me.
>
>Generally for a bug, we need:
>
>  the gdb version
>  the host operating system version
>  the target operating system version (if it's not the same as the
host)
>  a typescript of the whole gdb session showing the bug
>    (use the 'script' command)
>  some info about the inferior program:
>    what language it's written in
>    the exact compiler name and compiler version that it was built with
>
>Then if somebody picks up the bug, they're likely to come back with
>more questions.  The point at this stage is not to identify the bug,
>but just to throw enough information over the fence so that the
>gdb engineer can *reproduce* the bug.
>
>If it worked with a previous version of gdb, that's good to know.
>
>It's really great if you can supply a small test program
>(source + binary) that demonstrates the bug.
>
>And some bug reports are successful and get fixed, and some aren't
>and don't.
>
>Michael Chastain