From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-13546-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 18785 invoked by alias); 23 Apr 2003 22:17:27 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 18777 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2003 22:17:27 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO hub.ott.qnx.com) (209.226.137.76)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 23 Apr 2003 22:17:27 -0000
Received: from smtp.ott.qnx.com (smtp.ott.qnx.com [10.0.2.158])
	by hub.ott.qnx.com (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA24432;
	Wed, 23 Apr 2003 18:15:55 -0400
Received: from catdog ([10.4.2.2]) by smtp.ott.qnx.com (8.8.8/8.6.12) with SMTP id SAA30958; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 18:17:26 -0400
Message-ID: <002b01c309e6$21eb4260$0202040a@catdog>
From: "Kris Warkentin" <kewarken@qnx.com>
To: "Daniel Jacobowitz" <drow@mvista.com>
Cc: <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
References: <20030422174522.GA728@nevyn.them.org> <080801c30903$2dc0ae60$0202040a@catdog> <081f01c30904$ea5b7f90$0202040a@catdog> <20030422193013.GA25488@nevyn.them.org> <096e01c3099d$ba1f3a30$0202040a@catdog> <20030423211716.GA25678@nevyn.them.org> <0ca901c309de$a262f5d0$0202040a@catdog> <0cbf01c309e1$8bb32190$0202040a@catdog> <20030423214740.GA3719@nevyn.them.org> <000b01c309e5$098a5f90$0202040a@catdog> <20030423221137.GA6244@nevyn.them.org>
Subject: Re: long long considered harmful?
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 22:17:00 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg00278.txt.bz2

> At that point, the entire contents of this header (for GDB's purposes)
> could be:
> typedef union _debug_gregs
> {
>   qnx_reg64 padding[1024];
> };
>
> Right?
>
> If so, honestly I don't see the point of including it in GDB at all.

You're absolutely right.  Ultimately, if someone really wants to see how our
registers work, they can always go look at our system headers right?.
That's the problem with legacy code.  It's not always easy to see the wheat
for the chaff.  I think I'll get rid of all the register structures just as
you suggested.

cheers,

Kris