Re: gdb/633: fully qualified pathnames in solib_map_sections() and remote debugging

Andrew Cagney
2002-08-12T16:20:00Z

> At the moment, I like the first approach better because it's simpler.
> I'd prefer that we wait on the more complicated approach until a need
> is demonstrated for the additional complexity.
>
>
>> Adding a local/remote test is going to be easier.
>
>
> Do we already have such a test?

Well, looking at some finally dead hacks, ....

int
remote_Z_write_wp_packet_supported_p (void)
{
struct remote_state *rs = get_remote_state ();
/* Don't even think about it if the remote target isn't selected. */
/* FIXME: cagney/2002-05-19: This shouldn't be necessary - the
WATCHPOINT methods should be in the target vector. Ulgh! */
if (target_shortname == NULL
|| strcmp (target_shortname, "remote") != 0)
return 0;

notice that the problem it was trying to avoid was with ``target sim''.
So in the above the question is no longer local/remote but local VS
remote VS sim VS ....

Andrew