Re: gdb/633: fully qualified pathnames in solib_map_sections() and remote debugging

Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-08-12T16:31:36Z

On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 12:19:52PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>
> >At the moment, I like the first approach better because it's simpler.
> >I'd prefer that we wait on the more complicated approach until a need
> >is demonstrated for the additional complexity.
> >
> >
> >>Adding a local/remote test is going to be easier.
> >
> >
> >Do we already have such a test?
>
> Well, looking at some finally dead hacks, ....
>
> int
> remote_Z_write_wp_packet_supported_p (void)
> {
> struct remote_state *rs = get_remote_state ();
> /* Don't even think about it if the remote target isn't selected. */
> /* FIXME: cagney/2002-05-19: This shouldn't be necessary - the
> WATCHPOINT methods should be in the target vector. Ulgh! */
> if (target_shortname == NULL
> || strcmp (target_shortname, "remote") != 0)
> return 0;
>
> notice that the problem it was trying to avoid was with ``target sim''.
> So in the above the question is no longer local/remote but local VS
> remote VS sim VS ....

Note that the above hack doesn't even work. We're going to default to
extended-remote for gdbserver eventually. Could do it with strstr, I
suppose...

--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer