Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: stefan_heinzmann@t-online.de (Stefan Heinzmann)
To: <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Porting GDB to a new target processor architecture -- what's involved?
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 02:18:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <000901c1bf78$0e2b3d20$a49afea9@athlon600> (raw)

Hello,

a potential customer wants me to port GDB to a new processor architecture (a
32-bit RISC processor) used in embedded systems. As I'm unfamiliar with the
GDB internals, I have difficulties estimating the time needed to do this.
What do I need to know? Has anyone got a reading list?

The GCC (2.95.3) and binutils apparently have been ported already. To which
extent can I reuse code from those? I remember having read somewhere that
gas and gdb use common target definition files, is that true?

The GDB internals document is quite helpful, but it appears to be incomplete
(stack frame interpretation, compiler characteristics). Is there additional
information available (other than the source code itself)?

How does the development process work assuming that the new target is
contributed back to the community? Do I have to follow the most up-to-date
CVS tree closely or is it more useful to work "off-line"?

Is it reasonable to assume that the general gdb code can be used unchanged
and only a few target-specific files need to be provided, or is it common
that such a porting effort brings up issues with gdb in general (or even
with a graphical frontend) that will have to be addressed, too?

Thanks for your help

Cheers
Stefan


             reply	other threads:[~2002-02-27 10:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-02-27  2:18 Stefan Heinzmann [this message]
2002-02-28 14:38 ` Michael Snyder
2002-02-27 13:29 Salman Khilji

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='000901c1bf78$0e2b3d20$a49afea9@athlon600' \
    --to=stefan_heinzmann@t-online.de \
    --cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox