From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12606 invoked by alias); 22 Jun 2007 06:21:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 12594 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Jun 2007 06:21:44 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from hb17.de (HELO ww17.hb17.de) (80.190.209.47) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 06:21:41 +0000 Received: from insanenotebook (e179161135.adsl.alicedsl.de [85.179.161.135]) by ww17.hb17.de (ww17.hb17.de) with ESMTP id E923F11502D8 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 08:21:37 +0200 (CEST) From: "Sascha Radike" Cc: References: <000001c7b427$5822d330$02b2a8c0@insanenotebook><18042.56547.598273.973421@kahikatea.snap.net.nz><20070621202555.GA30881@caradoc.them.org> <18042.60967.652281.816747@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> Subject: Re: BUG: MI reporting wrong attributes for casted variables Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 06:21:00 -0000 Message-ID: <000401c7b495$950b6ff0$02b2a8c0@insanenotebook> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <18042.60967.652281.816747@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-06/txt/msg00185.txt.bz2 >Report it as a bug to the Eclipse CDT team. They have misinterpreted >the meaning of the "editable" attribute. >This has been reported at leasted once before, possibly by you (or at >least another Sascha using Eclipse CDT) when I said: It was me. I was busy doing other stuff and I first wanted to have a look at the eclipse code. It is possible to change the Eclipse CDT code so casted vars won't be editable. But then I thought this was more likely a GDB bug and it would make sense to resolve the root problem. >Assigns the value of EXPRESSION to the variable object specified by > NAME. The object must be `editable'. If the variable's value is I think this is pretty much what the CDT guys had in mind. They expect a var object to be editable when it has been reported as... "editable" :). Sascha