From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-17653-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 19863 invoked by alias); 18 Mar 2004 06:15:50 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 19848 invoked from network); 18 Mar 2004 06:15:48 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO alice.acmet.com) (61.11.104.16)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 18 Mar 2004 06:15:48 -0000
Received: from ARAMESH (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by alice.acmet.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i2I6DES15249
	for <gdb@sources.redhat.com>; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 11:43:14 +0530
From: "A.Ramesh" <aramesh@acmet.com>
To: <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Regarding 'set architecture <arch name>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 06:15:00 -0000
Message-ID: <000001c40caf$ccd90000$7b00a8c0@acme>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg00169.txt.bz2

Hi,

We have added new target in simulator. But the target will not reflect
for the disassembler.
If we are setting the architecture name explicitly using 'set
architecture <architecture name>', then the disassembler works for my
new target. If I invoke the command 'set architecture <tab>', my new
target doesn't display in the supported architecture name list. Why we
have to set the architecture explicitly ? Is this GDB design or any
changes required in disassembler configuration to support the current
target?

Regards
A.Ramesh